NASCAR: What’s wrong with NASCAR? Part 8 – Gimmicks

BROOKLYN, MI - JUNE 10: Kevin Harvick, driver of the #4 Jimmy John's Ford (Photo by Jerry Markland/Getty Images)
BROOKLYN, MI - JUNE 10: Kevin Harvick, driver of the #4 Jimmy John's Ford (Photo by Jerry Markland/Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
2 of 5
Next
BRISTOL, TN – AUGUST 18: Kyle Larson, driver of the #42 DC Solar Chevrolet (Photo by Sarah Crabill/Getty Images)
BRISTOL, TN – AUGUST 18: Kyle Larson, driver of the #42 DC Solar Chevrolet (Photo by Sarah Crabill/Getty Images) /

Stages

Don’t get me wrong, I like the stage idea. Personally, it gives me a break during the race to use the bathroom, grab a snack or doing something non-NASCAR for a few minutes. Stages have shown time and time again that they are a benefit to the sport by providing intense action in the mid-stages of the race.

Stages are doing exactly what they were supposed to do. So what’s the problem? NASCAR isn’t solving any issues with stages.

Yes, they’re new. Yes, they create excitement (at times), but stages aren’t what are going to revolutionize the sport. As I said in the first slide, this is an idea that has good intentions behind it, but it is just a cop-out.

If you think about racing without stages and compare it to now, you don’t think to yourself “man, things have gotten so much better”. Stages are a pure definition of “gimmick”. If NASCAR eliminated stages now, fans wouldn’t lose any sleep. Two mid-race breaks aren’t going to boost ratings or put butts in seats.

Overall, stages are an okay idea, but they are just another gimmick to give the appearance of NASCAR trying something new. It’s all a smokescreen. They know what to fix, and two unnecessary cautions aren’t it.